The Inspiration
of the Scriptures
Scientifically Demonstrated
By: Ivan Panin
For some months preceding Sunday, November 19th, 1899, the New York
Sun had been devoting the better part of a page of its Sunday edition to
the discussion of the truth of Christianity. On that date it printed a
letter from one W.R.L., in which he denounced Christianity, using the old
oft-refuted "arguments," and challenged "some champion of orthodoxy to come
into the arena of the Sun," and give its readers some "facts" in defence of
the Christian religion. The writer had not seen the N.Y. Sun for years;
but on his way from South Framingham to Grafton, Massachusetts, a copy of
the Sun of that date, left on a vacant seat in the train, fell into his
hands. The following letter met that challenge.
The letter was reprinted by the writer himself in a pamphlet of some
fifty pages with the Greek text of Matthew 1:1-17 and the vocabularies
thereto, enabling the scholarly reader to verify his statements for
himself.
Sir: -- In today's Sun Mr. W.R.L. calls for a "champion of orthodoxy"
to "step into the arena of the Sun," and give him some facts:
1. The first 17 verses of the New Testament contain the genealogy of
the Christ. It consists of two main parts: Verses 1-11 cover the period
from Abraham, the father of the chosen people, to the Captivity, when they
ceased as an independent people. Verses 12-17 cover the period from
Captivity to the promised Deliverer, the Christ.
Let us examine the first part of this genealogy.
Its vocabulary has 49 words, or 7 x 7. This number is itself seven
(Feature 1) sevens (Feature 2), and the sum of its factors is 2 sevens
(Feature 3). Of these 49 words 28, or 4 sevens, begin with a vowel; and
21, or 3 sevens, begin with a consonant (Feature 4).
Again: these 49 words of the vocabulary have 266 letters, or 7 x 2 x
19; this number is itself 38 sevens (Feature 5), and the sum of its factors
is 28, or 4 sevens (Feature 6), while the sum of its figures is 14, or 2
sevens (Feature 7). Of these 266 letters, moreover, 140, or 20 sevens, are
vowels and 126, or 18 sevens, are consonants (Feature 8).
That is to say: Just as the number of words in the vocabulary is a
multiple of seven, so is the number of its letters a multiple of seven;
just as the sum of the factors of the number of the words is a multiple of
seven, so is the sum of the factors of the number of their letters a
multiple of seven. And just as the number of words is divided between
vowel words and consonant words by seven, so is their number of letters
divided between vowels and consonants by sevens.
Again: of these 49 words 35, or 5 sevens, occur more than once in the
passage; and 14, or 2 sevens, occur but once (Feature 9); seven occur in
more than one form, and 42, or 6 sevens, occur in only one form (Feature
10). And among the parts of speech the 49 words are thus divided: 42, or 6
sevens, are nouns; seven are not nouns (Feature 11). Of the nouns 35, or 5
sevens, are Proper names; seven are common nouns (Feature 12). Of the
Proper names 28 are male ancestors of Christ, and seven are not (Feature
13).
Moreover, these 49 words are distributed alphabetically thus: Words
under [a range of Greek letters. Copier: I am not sure if I can accurately
copy them. Sorry.] are 21 in number, or 3 sevens; [another range of Greek
letters] 14, or 2 sevens; [another range of Greek letters] also 14. No
other groups of sevens stopping at the end of a letter are made by these 49
words, the groups of sevens stop with these letters and no others. But the
letters, [a list of Greek letters], are letters 1, 5, 6, 10, 12, 22, of the
Greek alphabet, and the sum of these numbers (called their Place Value) is
56, or 8 sevens (Feature 14).
The enumeration of the numeric phenomena of these 11 verses does not
begin to be exhaustive, but enough has been shown to make it clear that
this part of the genealogy is constructed on an elaborate design of sevens.
Let us now turn to the genealogy as a whole. I will not wear your
readers with recounting all the numeric phenomena thereof: pages alone
would exhaust them. I will point out only one feature. The New Testament
is written in Greek. The Greeks had no separate symbols for expressing
numbers, corresponding to our Arabic figures, but used instead the letters
of their alphabet: just as the Hebrews, in whose tongue the Old Testament
is written, made use of the same purpose of theirs. Accordingly, the 24
Greek letters stand for the following numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10,
20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800. Every
Greek word is thus a sum in arithmetic obtained by adding the numbers for
which its letters stand, or their numeric values.
Now the vocabulary to the entire genealogy has 72 words. If we
write its numeric value over each of these 72 words, and add them, we get
for their sum, 42,364, or 6,052 sevens, distributed into the following alphabetical groups only:
[a range of Greek letters] have 9,821, or 1,403 sevens;
[another range of Greek letters], 1,904, or 272 sevens;
[another range of Greek letters], 3,703, or 529 sevens;
[another range of Greek letters], 19,264, or 2,752 sevens;
[another range of Greek letters], 7,672, or 1,096 sevens.
But the numeric value of the 10 letters used for making these groups is 931, or 7 x 7 x 19, a multiple
not only of seven but of seven sevens.
Let Mr. W. R. L. try to write some 300 words intelligently like this
genealogy, and reproduce some numeric phenomena of like designs. If he
does it in 6 months, he will indeed do a wonder. Let us assume that
Matthew accomplished this feat in one month.
2. The second part of this chapter, verses 18-25, relates the birth
of the Christ. It consists of 161 words, or 23 sevens; occurring in 105
forms, or 15 sevens, with a vocabulary of 77 words or 11 sevens. Joseph is
spoken to here by the angel. Accordingly, of the 77 words the angel uses
28, or 4 sevens; of the 105 forms he uses 35, or 5 sevens; the numeric
value of the vocabulary is 52,605, or 7,515 sevens; of the forms, 65,429,
or 9,347 sevens.
This enumeration only begins as it were barely to scratch the surface
of the numerics of this passage. But what is specially noteworthy here is
the fact that the angel's speech has also a scheme of sevens making it a
kind of ring within a ring, a wheel within a wheel. If Mr. L. can write a
similar passage of 161 words with the same scheme of sevens alone (though
there are several others here) in some three years, he would accomplish a
still greater wonder. Let us assume that Matthew accomplished this feat in
only 6 months.
3. The second chapter of Matthew tells of the childhood of the
Christ. Its vocabulary has 161 words, or 23 sevens, with 896 letters, or
128 sevens, and 238 forms, or 34 sevens; the numeric value of the
vocabulary is 123,529, or 17,647 sevens; of the forms, 166,985, or 23,855
sevens; and so on through pages of enumeration. This chapter has at least
four logical divisions, and each division shows alone the same phenomena
found in the chapter as a whole. Thus the first six verses have a
vocabulary of 56 words, or 8 sevens, etc. There are some speeches here:
Herod speaks, the Magi speak, the angel speaks. But so pronounced are the
numeric phenomena here, that though there are as it were numerous rings
within rings, and wheels within wheels, each is perfect in itself, though
forming all the while only part of the rest.
If Mr. L. can write a chapter like this as naturally as Matthew
writes, but containing in some 500 words so many intertwined yet harmonious
numeric features, in say the rest of his days -- whatever his age now, or
the one to which he is to attain: if he thus accomplish it at all, it will
indeed be marvel of marvels. Let us assume that Matthew accomplished this
feat in only 3 years.
4. There is not, however, a single paragraph of the scores in Matthew
that is not constructed in exactly the same manner. Only with each
additional paragraph the difficulty of constructing it increases not in
arithmetical but in geometrical progression. For he contrives to write his
paragraphs so as to develop constantly fixed numeric relations to what goes
before and after. Thus in his last chapter he contrives to use just 7
words not used by him before. It would thus be easy to show that Mr. L.
would require some centuries to write a book like Matthew's. How long it
took Matthew the writer does not know. But how he contrived to do it
between the Crucifixion, A.D. 30 (and his Gospel could not have been
written earlier), and the destruction of Jerusalem, A.D. 70 (and the Gospel
could not have been written later), let Mr. L. and his likeminded explain.
Anyhow Matthew did it, and we thus have a miracle -- an unheard-of
literary, mathematical artist, unequalled, hardly even conceivable. This
is the first fact for Mr. L. to contemplate.
A second fact is yet more important: In his very first section, the
genealogy discussed above, the words found nowhere else in the New
Testament, occur 42 times, 7 x 6; and have 126 letters, 7 x 6 x 3, each
number a multiple not only of seven, but of 6 sevens, to name only two of
the many numeric features of these words. But how did Matthew know, when
designing this scheme for these words (whose sole characteristic is that
they are found nowhere else in the New Testament) that they would not be
found in the other 26 books? that they would not be used by the other 7 New
Testament writers? Unless we assume the impossible hypothesis that he
had an agreement with them to that effect, he must have had the rest of the
New Testament before him when he wrote his book. The Gospel of Matthew,
then, was written last.
5. It so happens, however, that the Gospel of Mark shows the very
same phenomena. Thus the very passage called so triumphantly in today's
Sun a "forgery," the Last Twelve Verses of Mark, presents among some sixty
features of sevens the following phenomena:
It has 175 words, or 25 sevens;
a vocabulary of 98 words, or 2 sevens of sevens,
with 533 letters, or 79 sevens;
133 forms, or 19 sevens,
and so on to the minutest detail.
Mark, then, is another miracle, another unparalleled literary genius.
And in the same way in which it was shown that Matthew wrote last it is
also shown that Mark, too, wrote last. Thus to take an example from this
very passage: It has just one word found nowhere else in the New
Testament, [a Greek word], "deadly". This fact is signalled by no less than
seven features of sevens, thus:
Its numeric value is 581, or 83 sevens,
with the sum of its figures 14, or 2 sevens,
of which the letters 3, 5, 7, 9 from the BEGINNING of the word have 490, or 7 x 7 x 5 x 2: a multiple of seven sevens,
with the sum of its factors 21, or 3 sevens.
In the vocabulary it is preceded by 42 words, 7 x 6;
in the passage itself by 126 words, or 7 x 6 x 3,
both numbers multiples not only of seven, but of 6 sevens.
We have thus established before us this third fact for Mr. L. to contemplate: Matthew surely wrote after Mark, and Mark just as surely wrote
after Matthew.
6. It happens, however, to be a fourth fact that Luke presents the
same phenomena as Matthew and Mark, and so do John, and James, and Peter,
and Jude, and Paul. And we have thus no longer two great unheard-of
mathematical literati, but eight of them and each wrote after the other.
7. And not only this: As Luke and Peter wrote each 2 books, John 5,
and Paul 14, it can in the same way be shown that each of the 27 New
Testament books was written last. In fact, not a page of the over 500 in
Westcotts and Hort's Greek edition (which the writer has used throughout)
but it can be demonstrated thus to have been written last.
The phenomena are there and there is no human way of explaining them.
Eight men cannot each write last, 27 books, some 500 pages, cannot each be
written last. But once assume that one Mind directed the whole, and the
problem is solved simply enough; but this is Verbal Inspiration -- of every
jot and tittle of the New Testament.
There remains only to be added that by precisely the same kind of
evidence the Hebrew Old Testament is proved to be equally inspired. Thus
the very first verse of Genesis has seven words, 28 letters, or 4 sevens:
to name only two out of the dozens of numeric features of this one verse of
only seven words.
-- N.Y. Sun, Nov. 21st, 1899 -- Corrected
To this letter several replies appeared in the Sun, but not a single
answer. For in only three ways can it be refuted.
(a) By showing that the facts are not as here given.
(b) By showing that it is possible for 8 men to write each after the
other 7; for 27 books, or some 500 pages, to be each in its turn written
last.
(c) By showing that even if the facts be true, the arithmetic
faultless, and the collocation of the numerics honest, it does not follow
that mere men could not have written this without Inspiration from above.
Accordingly, as many as nine noted rationalists (of whom Drs. Lyman
Abbot and Charles W. Eliot are still living (now in 1927 also gone to where
they may know) were respectfully but publicly invited to refute the writer.
One was not "interested" in the writer's "arithmetical" doings; two
"regretted" that they "had no time" to give heed thereto. Another "did not
mean to be unkind" but . . . . The rest were silent. For the special
benefit of these the writer printed the original data with numerous
details, enabling them in the easiest manner to verify every statement made
by him, if they wished. And to the best of his ability he has for years
seen to it that no scholar whom surely these things specially concern
should remain in ignorance of the facts here recounted, and of hundreds of
like cogency.
A notable exception to the above is a lawyer of standing (now also
dead), whose books on Law are deemed as of authority. He had intelligence
enough and candour withal to confess that the case for the Bible as made
out by the writer is impregnable, that the Bible is thus proved to be an
"absolutely unique book." This much the case itself extorts from the but
too well equipped writer on -- Evidence: and accordingly he henceforth
reads the writer's Numerics with intense appreciation. And then, fresh
from this confession, he betakes himself once more to the circulation of
his anti-Christian books in the writing of which he joys to spend his
leisure hours.
In the second letter to the N.Y. Sun the author, in discussing some
irrelevant "answers" to his first letter, recited the three ways of
refuting him and then continued:
"No sane man will try to refute me by the second method. To refute me
by the first method I herewith respectfully invite any or all of the
following to prove that my facts are not facts: namely Messrs. Lyman
Abbott, Washington Gladden, Heber Newton, Minot J. Savage, Presidents Eliot
of Harvard, White of Cornell, and Harper, the University of Chicago,
Professor J. Henry Thayer of Harvard, and Dr. Briggs, and any other
prominent higher critic so called. THey may associate with themselves, if
they choose, all the contributors of the ninth edition of the Encyclopedia
Britannica who wrote its articles on Biblical subjects, together with a
dozen mathematicians of the calibre of Professor Simon Newcomb. The
heavier the calibre of either scholar or mathematician, the more
satisfactory to me.
"They will find that my facts are facts. And since they are facts, I
am ready to take them to any three prominent lawyers, or, better still, to
any judge of the Superior or Supreme Court, and abide by his decision as to
whether the conclusion is not necessary that Inspiration alone can account
for the facts, if they are facts.
"All I should ask would be that the judge treat the case as he would
any other case that comes before him: declining to admit matters for
discussion as irrelevant when they are irrelevant; and listening patiently
to both sides, as he does in any trial."
| Bible Numerics | Bible Numerics | |
| P.O. Box 206 | 7600 Jubilee Drive | |
| Waubaushene, Ontario | Niagara Falls, Ontario | |
| L0K 2C0 | L2G 7J6 | |
BACK to CCC 4 JC's List of Goodies
Favourite Links:
Kidz 4 Christ
3-John-2's Online Art Gallery
OHzone - Where Christian Writers Meet
CCC 4 JC (Christian Country CONTACT for Jesus Christ) is brought to you by Christian Country CONTACT, Kidz4Christ and OHzone.